Blog Post

Employee Financial Wellness and Its Impact on Canadian Businesses

Jul 19, 2016

No matter what business you’re in or how many people work for you, your employees are likely among your key assets. Your business probably wouldn’t be successful without them. And your business functions best when they are at their best.

Through research carried out in 2014, Manulife has established that there is a strong relationship between personal financial wellness, physical and emotional health, and productivity. We are of the view that to keep employees engaged, and to keep productivity optimal, employees need to be physically and emotionally healthy, and they need to be financially well, too.

In 2015 Manulife commissioned Environics Research Group to survey 2,004 individuals to gain a better understanding of Canadians’ financial wellness levels. The results were eye opening.

The survey showed that while 28% of respondents felt they had a high level of financial wellness and just over one-quarter (27%) felt they had a medium level of financial wellness, almost half (45%) identified themselves as having a low level of financial wellness. This alarming statistic manifests itself in numerous ways, including a lack of retirement readiness, inadequate financial protection in case of unforeseen events and high levels of money-related stress.

Digging deeper into the segment of respondents with a low level of financial wellness, nearly half (45%) of them felt distracted at work because of financial worries. Our previous researchi has identified that distracted employees, or employees who are not engaged in their work, have lower rates of productivity, which can negatively affect business’ bottom line. This leads us to believe that disengaged employees are also less attached to their organization and therefore more likely to be lured away by other employers, which increases a company’s costs for employee searches, hiring and training.

Financial support and education, well beyond retirement education, could go a long way toward improving the financial wellness of your employees. That means helping employees holistically – from savings to debt to insurance. For some employers, the workplace can be an ideal spot to deliver the tools that allow employees to achieve improved financial wellness for themselves, thereby becoming more engaged in their work and boosting the bottom line of the organization they work for, too.

MANULIFE’S FINANCIAL WELLNESS STUDY – BENCHMARK 2015

In early July 2015 Environics Research Group surveyed 2,004 Canadians, 18 and over, asking them about six segments

of their financial life: budgeting, retirement, investments, debt, protection and stress. Respondents were equally split along gender lines, the mean age was 47, and quotas and weighting were used to ensure that results reflected the Canadian distribution in terms of age, gender and region.

The 2015 survey was designed as a benchmark and is intended to be repeated annually to create an informative index to track financial wellness over time.

What is Financial Wellness?

Financial wellness is not measured by the amount of money in a person’s investment accounts or the years they have left to pay off their mortgage. A person who has a high level of financial wellness is confident about a wide range of issues that make up their financial life, including budgeting, retirement plans, investments, debts and insurance.

It’s quite possible for a person to have a high income but a low level of financial wellness. It could be that these high earners aren’t planning for the future, they’re not working toward paying off their debts or they’re constantly worried about money.

Conversely, it’s quite possible for a person to have a lower income and a high level of financial wellness. A young person who is just starting out in their career, for instance, isn’t earning a high salary but can feel confident about their finances because they’ve educated themselves, asked for advice, created a workable budget and started saving for retirement.

Our survey found that financial wellness seems to have some momentum to it. If a person demonstrated a high level of financial wellness in one area they tended to have a high level of financial wellness in the other areas as well.

For instance, among the respondents who had an overall high level of financial wellness, 99% also scored well for budgeting, 61% scored well for retirement planning, 100% scored well for debt management and 76% scored well for stress management.

This shows that once a person has committed to addressing one aspect of their financial life, they will likely address the others as well, resulting in overall good financial health. Employers benefit from helping their employees get educated about finances and making that first step toward financial wellness because, as a result, employees will become less anxious about money and more engaged at work.

Benefits and consequences of high and low levels of financial wellness

The benefits of a high level of financial health can be both concrete and more abstract. A concrete benefit, for example, is having a well-funded retirement savings plan due to diligent budgeting and taking advantage of appropriate investment vehicles over a long time horizon. A related abstract benefit is feeling little to no stress about retirement.

Another concrete benefit is having few debts, an actionable plan to pay down debts or having manageable mortgage debt, which will one day result in outright home ownership. A related abstract benefit is, again, fewer financial worries and more overall confidence.

Consequences of a low level of financial wellness are, similarly, concrete and abstract. Poor budgeting and investing, among other factors, can lead to a poorly funded retirement savings plan and the accompanying stress. Inadequate insurance coverage can mean financial hardship if an accident, death or disability occurs, as well as the accompanying worry about such unforeseen events happening.

Another consequence of having a low level of financial wellness is that it can be a self-fulfilling prophesy. Just as people who were found to have high levels of financial wellness tended to score well across all survey categories, people who have low levels of financial wellness tended to score poorly across most categories.

According to the survey, 73% of respondents with an overall low level of financial health also scored poorly for retirement planning, and only 27% of people with a low level of financial health had a medium score for retirement planning. No one with an overall low level of financial health scored well when it came to retirement planning. It’s not surprising that 85% of respondents who have an overall low level of financial health also ranked “poorly” for insurance protection and 63% indicated they had high levels of finance-related stress in their lives. Based on this, that stress can lead to anxiety and poor mental health, which takes a toll at home and in the workplace, through disengagement and lack of productivity.

Snapshots

The Environics survey allows us to take a focused look at who has a high level of financial wellness and who has a low level of financial wellness across a broad spectrum of the Canadian population, and to zero in on Canadian workers.

For the first time in history, our working population includes five generations of Canadians, ranging from Generation Z to Baby Boomers. These people are at dramatically different stages in their lives and their careers, with different priorities at the top of their lists, and it can be challenging for a workplace to cater to everyone’s financial needs.

AGES AND STAGES

The differences among respondents become evident when reviewing how people of various ages and life stages tend to feel about their financial wellness. Those who felt they had a high level of financial wellness increased steadily from 14% of those under 25 years of age to 40% of those over 65. And those who felt they had a low level of financial wellness decreased from 55% among those under 25 years old to 30% for those over 65. These progressions are promising because they show that as people age they become more financially secure due to factors such as increased salaries, more financial education, decreased debt and better retirement readiness. The progressions are also logical: It would be unrealistic to expect a 22-year-old, just starting out in their career and independent financial life, to have the same level of financial wellness as a 66-year-old does. In fact, it’s likely that the same 22-year-old who identifies herself as having a low level of financial wellness will show that she has a higher level of financial wellness by the time she reaches her 60s.

We are of the view that one of the best ways to help young people who self-identify as having a low level of financial wellness is to give them access to a broad financial education. If they become adept at managing savings, debt, investments and insurance, they will be in a better financial position when it comes to saving for retirement as well.

Following the pattern outlined above, when surveyed specifically about financial planning and saving for retirement, the survey found that the youngest respondents were least likely (8%) to agree with the statement: I’m saving on a regular basis and I’m on track to reach my retirement goal. Among respondents over age 65, 33% agreed. It’s a positive trend to see growth in the number of people feeling secure about their retirement, but younger people have the benefit of longevity and compound interest to make their savings grow, and should be advised to get more involved in long-term financial planning as soon as they enter the workforce. It’s also important for those in the older cohorts to not be complacent about their financial wellbeing. The research showed that people tend to have higher levels of financial wellness as they mature, but unexpected life circumstances – such as divorce or a job loss – could reverse that.

Lifestyle also had a bearing, as respondents who were married or co-habiting were more than twice as likely (23%) to be saving and staying on track for retirement as their single counterparts (11%). Also noteworthy was that respondents who owned their home were more than twice as likely (26%) to say they were saving and on track for retirement as people who rented their homes (11%).

GENDER

Across the board, the survey found that men self-identified as having higher levels of financial wellness than women. However, past research conducted by Environics shows that men tend to report higher levels of confidence than women, so their answers need to be viewed against that background. Overall, a high level of financial wellness was indicated by 32% of men, versus 25% of women.

On the topic of financial knowledge, 32% of men said their level of savings and investment knowledge was beginner, versus 50% of women. When asked how ready they were to improve their financial situation, slightly more women than men said “very.” And when it comes to confidence, 74% of women agreed that they would “like to be more confident about making financial decisions,” while only 66% of men had the same response.

Additionally, 74% of women agreed that they worry about their financial situation and 34% of them agreed that financial worries caused them stress at work, versus only 66% of men worrying about their situation and 31% of them saying it affects them at work.

These findings lead us to believe that all employees would benefit from improving their financial knowledge, in the workplace or elsewhere. Women may be more receptive to the offer while men may require some persuasion to recognize how additional education and support could benefit them.

GEOGRPAHY

Across the country, the most regional differences were seen when comparing Quebec to the five other regions (Atlantic Canada, Ontario, Manitoba/Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia). The Quebec residents who were surveyed were least likely to indicate they felt finance-related stress (51% scored “good” on the survey’s stress index, versus 47% for all respondents) and they indicated they had higher levels of financial wellness related to debt, with 88% scoring “good” on the survey’s debt index, versus 82% for all respondents. However, respondents in Quebec scored second lowest in the retirement index, with only 16% feeling retirement ready, versus 20% for the rest of the country.

Another outlier was British Columbia, where the cost of housing in Vancouver and the Lower Mainland has become increasingly unaffordable in recent years. Only 22% of British Columbians surveyed indicated a high overall level of financial wellness (versus 28% for the country as a whole) and 24% scored “poorly” on the debt index, compared to 18% for all respondents. Specifically, the survey found that only 32% of respondents in British Columbia indicated that they have debt and are able to pay it down, compared to 40% of all respondents.

Finance related stress Financial wellness related to debt

51% 88%

of Quebecers scored “good”                   of Quebecers scored “good"
on the survey's stress index                   on the survey's debt index

47% 82%

of all respondents scored “good”                 of all respondents scored “good”
on the survey's stress index                   on the survey's debt index

INDUSTRY

More financial support and education would benefit all employees, but the survey found that respondents who had low levels of financial wellness tended to work in trade (retail and wholesale) (12%), accommodation and food services (8%), business, building and other support services (7%) and transportation, warehousing and utilities (6%). Respondents who indicated they had a high level of financial wellness were more likely to work in professional, scientific and technical services (12%), manufacturing (10%) and education (10%). However, no one sector stood out as having a high level of financial wellness. Even within finance, insurance and real estate, where one could reasonably expect to find well-educated, financially aware workers, 36% indicated they had a low level of financial wellness. The survey also found that people who had a high level of financial wellness were more likely to be managers (26%) or professionals (25%).

ADDITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS

The survey revealed some additional, and troubling, insights about the people who identified themselves as having a low level of financial wellness. People with a low level of financial wellness indicated that they are more focused on short-term issues than long-term ones.

For example, the top financial priority for the 45% of respondents who were found to have poor financial wellness was paying off debt, with 58% of people in this cohort citing that as their main focus. That compares with only 26% of people with a high level of financial wellness. It’s undeniable that paying off debt should be a priority, but for this segment it seems to be taking precedence over big-picture plans, such as saving for retirement – which was a priority for only 14% of these respondents. It was also noteworthy that among all survey respondents, saving for short-term needs (such as buying a car or funding a vacation) was the second-highest priority, after paying down debt, and planning for retirement ranked sixth. People with a low level of financial wellness also indicated that creating an emergency fund was high on their list of priorities, with 33% of people working toward that goal versus 12% of the people who were more financially secure.

On the other hand, people with a high level of financial wellness indicated that their top two financial priorities: ensuring that their savings are wisely invested (45%) and minimizing the income tax that they pay every year (35%). People with a low level of financial wellness also seemed less interested in educating themselves about finances than did their peers with a higher level of financial wellness. According to the survey, only 12% of people with poor financial wellness visit investment-related websites, versus 34% of people who are financially healthier and 22% of the respondents overall. Finally, the study revealed a correlation between do-it-yourself investors and people with a low level of financial wellness. Specifically, 66% of people with poor financial health agreed with the statement “I prefer to manage my finances myself and not rely on an advisor.” Only 48% of the people with a high level of financial wellness indicated they felt the same way, suggesting that having guidance and advice are linked to financial security.

Of respondents with poor financial wellness:

58%
said their top financial priority was paying off debt
14%
said saving for retirement was a top priority

Deep dive into financial wellness

The Environics Research survey unearthed a wealth of information about Canadians’ habits related to various aspects of their financial lives: budgeting, retirement, investments, debt, insurance and stress.

BUDGETING

The good news is that fully 87% of respondents said they have a budget, which simply means that they keep track of income and expenses. Not surprisingly, more people with a high level of financial wellness have a budget (95%) versus those with a low level of financial wellness (81%).

However, having a budget isn’t the same as sticking to it. While 86% of people agreed that they usually spend within their means, only 73% of those with a low level of financial wellness were in that camp, versus 99% of people with sound financial health. In terms of age, people in the older cohorts indicated they would be more likely to stick to their budget: 84% of people 35 to 44 years old said they spend within their means, while the same was true for 86% of people 45 to 54, and 89% of people 55 to 64. People 65 and older were the most likely to stick to their budget, probably because they’re most likely to be on a fixed income, with 93% reporting that they spend within their means.

RETIREMENT

Canadians are living longer than ever before. The current life expectancy is 78.8 years for men and 83.3 years for women. But people who reach age 65 tend to have even greater longevity: men can expect to live another 18.5 years, to age 83.5, and women can expect to live another 21.6 years, to 87.6 years.

That means people can spend more years in retirement – sometimes more years than they spent in the workforce. This is why retirement needs to be a top priority for all Canadians, even though the study found that retirement is still more than 10 years away for two-thirds of non-retired respondents.
Therefore, it’s troubling to find that 35% of those aged 25-64 are not saving for retirement. This finding is inextricably linked to the fact that more people said they were saving for short-term goals and paying down debt than saving for their retirement years.

Overall, only 19% of people surveyed said they were saving on a regular basis and were confident about meeting their retirement goals. And 44% either said they were not saving on a regular basis or didn’t know whether they were on track to meet their retirement goals. At almost 50% of respondents, this is a very large group of people who might not have a secure retirement ahead of them. The largest cohort of people who indicated they were not saving – at 50% – was people under 25 years of age. When asked for the main reason why they’re not saving, 43% of people under 25 indicated that it was too early to start saving. However, today’s young workers can benefit greatly from understanding that they have longevity on their side. If someone invested $5,000 a year from age 25 to 40, and then didn’t add to their investment account for another 25 years, assuming a 5% rate of return, they would have about $130,000 more money at age 65 than if they started saving the same amount when they were 40.

19% saving on a regular basis and confident about meeting their retirement goals

INVESTMENTS

When it came to investments, 67% of survey respondents agreed that their savings were invested in a way that was right for them – with 21% saying “definitely” and 46% saying “I think so.” But 11% didn’t know if their savings were invested correctly for them and almost one-quarter of respondents (22%) had no savings at all. People who work in finance, insurance and real estate showed the most confidence in how their savings were invested (45%), and people in wholesale or retail trade were most likely to say they had no savings (35%).

22% of Canadians had no savings at all

DEBT

While it seems to be universally frowned upon, not all debt is bad. Mortgage debt, for instance, which is paid down monthly until outright home ownership is achieved, usually after the property has appreciated in value, is good debt. Car loan debt is neutral, with the understanding that cars depreciate over the years. And credit card debt – often coupled with double-digit interest rates – is not good debt.

Overall, 56% of Canadians have some kind of debt, whether it be good, bad or neutral. Fewer people who identified themselves as having a high level of financial wellness have debt than people with a low level of financial wellness (37% versus 69%), and people in Atlantic Canada (63%) were most likely to have debt. Among those with debt, 71% said they were able to make their payments with no difficulty. The other 29% of the population either indicated they had difficulty making their payments or didn’t know if they could. That means, in total, 16% of Canadians (29% of 56% of people with debt) are not managing their debt well and likely feeling stress related to that.

To further illustrate poor debt management skills uncovered by the survey, 49% of respondents who are struggling to pay their debt said that in the past 12 months they have not paid their credit card balance in full every month, 46% said they were not able to make some debt payments on time and 46% said they were not able to reduce their overall debt.

46% said they were not able to make debt payments on time
46% said they were not able to reduce their overall debt

PROTECTION

Canadians are still not creating enough financial protection for themselves and their families, which can lead to stress in the short term and financial hardship if the unexpected were to happen.

Fully 43% of Canadians said they were not financially well, or didn’t know whether they were financially well, if they, their spouse or dependents were to die. Additionally, 40% responded the same way when asked whether they were prepared if they, their spouse or dependents developed a serious illness and 43% responded the same way about a disability. This means that almost half (42%) of Canadians are living precariously, possibly just one diagnosis or accident away from financial insecurity.

Once again, an overall high level of financial wellness was most closely correlated with feeling prepared for the unexpected. People with a high level of financial wellness were more likely to say they would be prepared in case of death (68%), serious illness (57%) or disability (53%) than people with a low level of financial wellness, who scored 12%, 6% and 6% respectively, for the same questions.
More than half of survey respondents (56%) do not have a will, and 66% do not have a power of attorney. Being unprepared for their own end-of-life decisions could be stressful for these individuals and will most likely have a negative impact on those closest to them.

56% of the population do not have a will
43% of Canadians said they were not financially well, or didn't know whether they were financially well, if they, their spouse or dependents were to die

STRESS

Feeling pressure and stress over financial matters is very common. Seventy per cent of people surveyed agreed that they worry about their financial situation often or sometimes, and 33% of overall respondents said that worry distracts them at work.

Among people who had a low level of financial wellness, 85% worried about money often or sometimes, which was almost twice as many as the people who had good financial health. And almost half of the people with poor financial health (45%) said that their financial concerns distracted them at work, versus only 17% of people with a high level of financial wellness.

When people are able to take control of all aspects of their financial lives – not just retirement planning – their finance-related stress will decrease. And by improving their overall financial health, their retirement prospects are likely to be enhanced as well.

45% of the financially unwell said that their financial concerns distracted them at work

Financial advice

The value of good financial advice from a credible source is both tangible and intangible. The tangible aspect is witnessing the funds build up in an investment account after acting on the advice of a financial advisor. The intangible aspect is the feeling of security a person can gain from knowing they have a professional on their side. For example, a financial advisor, which can be any practicing professional who provides advice and information on financial services, such as mortgages, loans, insurance, mutual funds and more. We believe this feeling of security can positively influence many aspects of a person’s life, including their career choices, their attitude at work and the values they pass on to their children.
A person doesn’t need to have a high net worth to take advantage of an advisor’s knowledge. According to the Environics Research survey, 41% of Canadians said they had some sort of financial advisor and 59% said they prefer to manage their finances themselves and not rely on an advisor.
When we look at the level of financial wellness among survey respondents, we see a sharp divide between those who use financial advisors and those who don’t. Just over half (53%) of the respondents who identified themselves as having a high level of financial wellness said they usually consult a professional advisor before making a financial move. But just 18% of people with poor financial health said they did the same.

Financially well
53% consult an advisor

Financially unwell

18% consult an advisor

Financial health and business

An employee’s personal financial heath definitely has an impact on their workplace – especially if the employee has a low level of financial wellness, inevitably accompanied by stress.

The survey revealed that 42% of working Canadians overall say they are distracted at work because they are worrying about money. And previous Manulife research has shown that people struggling with their personal finances felt they were 16% less productive on the job.i For an employee earning $50,000 a year, that equates to $8,000 in salary paid but for which the work performed was sub-optimal. This number grows with each additional employee who finds himself in the same situation, increasing the impact on their employer’s bottom line.

42% of working Canadians overall say they are distracted at work because they are worrying about money

The financially unprepared say they are 16% less productive on the jobi

Employer's role

On a positive note, the survey found that nearly three-quarters (74%) of Canadians surveyed felt they were ready to take steps to improve their financial situation. Even among people with a low level of financial wellness, the desire to improve was high, at 69%. The desire to improve was even higher (79%) among those whose financial health was already good, a finding that points to the importance of viewing a plan member's financial wellness holistically, and working to engage them towards continual improvement.

Employers will benefit from being able to accurately assess their employees’ level of financial wellness so that they can be effective in helping support their employees and positively impact their workplace engagement. And because financial wellness encompasses a broad spectrum of issues – not just having a retirement plan or workplace benefits – it’s best to work with a provider who understands how employees feel and can offer relevant solutions to specific challenges.

How employers can benefit from supporting employees' financial wellness

When people are offered, and take advantage of, the tools to become more financially stable they can become less anxious, more engaged in their work and better workplace contributors. They can also pass these positive attitudes on to their colleagues, creating a chain reaction with far-reaching ripple effects.

Tools, such as retirement savings plans, insurance products, access to advice and education, do not need to be delivered in the workplace, but when they are, employees typically recognize that their employer is actively supporting them. Over the long term, employers who are seen as positively contributing to their employees’ financial wellness will develop a reputation for supporting employees and will improve their employer brand, which will help them retain valuable employees and gain an upper hand in the competition for top talent.

Get a quote now!

By Warren Handsor 29 Apr, 2021
Living Benefits is a clear winner when purchasing your 1st Life Insurance policy The most obvious reason to buy life insurance is when you have clear insurable interest and have financial protection against a catastrophic accident or illness. For example, you may have large debt obligations from student loans, credit cards, and housing obligations you do not want to be passed on to someone else. You might also have a partner and/or child who relies on you for financial support. Family members could depend on the insurance claim to survive in the event something unfortunate was to happen to you.
By Warren Handsor 29 Apr, 2021
A Life insurance policy with critical illness coverage provides a lump-sum payment to policyholders who survive one of the critical illnesses listed in the policy. 1 out of 3 Canadians will be diagnosed with some form of critical illness. Critical Illness is a defined disease or illness in a state in which death is possible or imminent. The initial sign you are experiencing a critical illness is when you get rushed to the hospital and admitted into an intensive care unit and placed on life support because of complications of a severe illness that manifests itself in one or more of the following conditions; 1. Heart attack 2. Stroke 3. Respiratory complications 4. Infectious disease such as a rash 5. pneumonia
By Warren Handsor 29 Apr, 2021
Canada Education Savings Program (CESP) is an opportunity for parents in Canada to start saving for their child’s post-secondary education from the time the child is born until age 17. The Government of Canada has reported more than $63.0 billion in registered education saving funds at the end of 2019 with $5.0 billion contributed in that same year. Assess to post secondary education is a high priority for most Canadians with more than 7 million children are registered in the CESP where more than 53% of those children are currently receiving benefits to pay for their education.
By Warren Handsor 29 Apr, 2021
Permanent life is preferable to term insurance by 2:1 high- net-worth Canadians taken in an Ipsos poll study in 2016 by Sun Life High-net-worth Canadians prefer permanent life insurance to term insurance-worth taken in an Ipsos poll study in 2016 by Sun Life 1. Why would a high-net-worth individual want to purchase life insurance? Response: high-net-worth (HNW) earners see Permanent life insurance as an investment; to guarantee a stream of tax-free income upon death to support their loved, ones who depend on the paternal income for continued financial support and to allow for generational transfer of continual capital growth of net worth without interruption to be managed as part of the overall family estate 2. Okay, but why Permanent and not Term? Response: Term insurance is preferable to permanent if purchased for a specified need and time, as with a 25 year amortization period mortgage; unless you die within that time frame, the insurance will end. Whereas you purchase Permanent insurance at a level premium for life, along with the cash value and dividends accumulation, you own the policy. The permanent policy only ends when the policy owner dies or surrenders the policy for its surrender cash value. 3. Weigh in on the pros and cons of paying a higher premium for Permanent insurance? Response: Advantages of Permanent Life option: a. Premiums are level b. You can pay premiums to allow the policy to be paid up over a set period c. Owning permanent life insurance; you generate tax-free earnings within the policy to cover unforeseen health concerns such as critical illness and long-term care d. Tax-free investment vehicle; choice of investment portfolio and earned dividends from participating life policy e. Ability to allow your whole life policy to be a spousal /dependent testamentary trust f. Under Canadian succession laws, a life policy bypasses rebate fees provided the policy did not list the estate as the beneficiary. g. Under Canadian law, you can set up an Insurance testamentary trust and have a Trustee manage the trust for a limited period on behalf of the dependents before disbursements. h. A permanent policy can provide for term riders geared to specific needs over a set period, then end. i. Ability to leverage the cash value within the policy for a personal loan Response: Disadvantage of Permanent Life: exercising an option to cash in on the surrender of the policy and allow it to lapse in doing so several factors will affect the early surrender value of the policy; a. How long the policy has been in force and the total amount of premiums paid to date b. The amount of interest, dividends, and capital gains that the cash value has earned in the policy c. The amount of cash surrender fees the insurance company will need to assess to liquidate the policy d. The portion of the cash surrender that is the actual premium paid is not taxable, but that portion of the surrender value classified as dividends, interest, and capital gain is taxable earnings. All the factors taken together by the surrender cash value of the policy will be less than the actual cash value if taken out too soon. It is best advised to exercise other options to avoid an early surrender of the policy, such as a policy loan already mentioned under the advantages.
By Warren Handsor 03 Apr, 2020
There are 2 coverage components of your Travel Insurance Plan you need to read closely which will have a direct impact while travelling outside of your province prior to March 13, 2020 when the Canadian Government placed travel restrictions on Canadian looking to travel abroad. 1. Travel Insurance Plan: Medical emergency - in most policies all related expenses related to emergency medical costs as well as emergency evacuation if need be will be covered . Trip cancellation/interruption - if you planned a trip scheduled after March 14, 2020 and had to be cancel due to COVID-19 you will be refunded 100% and if you were aboard prior to March 14, 2020 and instructed by Canadian government to return, you can expect a prorated refund for early return. The other insurance policy has to to with income replacement Short Term Disability Plan a private income replacement plan and / or Employment Insurance (E I) which is mandatory coverage by the Canadian government paid as a payroll deduction by you if you are an employee. 2. Short Term Disability Plan: if you test positive and become ill with the COVID 19 you can receive as much as 75% of your weekly earnings to a maximum amount depending on the type of short term coverage listed in your policy. Payment will continue upon until you recover or a maximum period of 8 weeks if you are expected to remain in your home to recover you can expect the same benefits If you become critically ill and not able to return to work after 8 week period you may be eligible for Long Term disability (LTD) depending on the severity of your illness and the type LTD arrangement you have with your employer or self-employed a private plan. In all cases contact your employer and check your employee benefits package for details for your specific situation. If you are self-employed check your disability policy and/or contact your advisor. To make a Short-Term Disability Claim due to COVID – 19 pay close attention to this recent notice regarding claims to your employers
By Warren Handsor 03 Apr, 2020
ALERT: ON OR AFTER MARCH 13, 2020 YOUR TRAVEL EMERGENCY HEALTH PLAN MAY BECOME UNENFORCEABLE DUE TO CANADIAN TRAVEL ADVISORY
By Warren Handsor 01 Jun, 2019
The beauty of searching online for insurance you are able to obtain a wealth of information from various sources without interruption and at your own pace. You can compare and seek out rates from different types of insurance coverage, Life, Disability, Critical Illness, Healthcare and Travel to name a few. You can determine why rates are different based on various factors such as health related issues, duration of policy, type of additional benefits know as additional riders. All these factors go into helping explain the difference in premium rates. You will further learn why rates are different based on the duration of a certain policy such as Term Vs Permanent and why Universal Life Policies based on investment and savings options will alter the premium rates based on your personal choice. Having information first hand why insurance policies differ can help you better appreciate why premium rates can vary not just the type of policy based factors such as gender, age and state of health plays a major role in determining rates as well. Now that you have a base knowledge about insurance in general and how rates can vary, you can now go online to look up coverage not just for yourself but for family members and close friend as well in assisting with their respective rates without guessing and doing false comparison based verbal hearsay. Having access to quoting helps you become a better informed buyer. There is one reservation that must not be overlooked when looking to purchase a policy online; premium quotes are actuarial calculations based on four primary factors: age, gender , duration, amount of coverage and the underlying health risk. In the case of a standard Online Quote does not take into account the underwriting analysis and the collaboration that takes place between the underwriter and advisor that is typically brought back to you prior to applying online could overt a possible risk of being rated or worst declined and creating complication in not being able to apply for the same type of policy insurance for at least 2 years including being red flagged with the Medical Insurance Bureau (MIB) of Canada. Recall back in a day long before all things internet came along, an insurance agent would come knocking on your door to see if you were interested in buying a Life Insurance Policy on the spot. By contract today consumers are well informed buyers able to investigate online and do some research on your own, reviewing various benefits including comparing premium rates from leading insurers before speaking with an insurance advisor. This truly is a beautiful and tremendous breakthough for the insurance industry and especially on the part of a more enabled conscientious buyer who takes a more need based approach in the case of purchasing a Life Insurance policy rather than being drawn into a sales driven approach based only on raw emotions.
By Warren Handsor 30 May, 2016
W hile discounted gym memberships, paid-for massages, or free orthotic shoes are what get most employees excited about their benefits packages, it is the heavyweight insurance-based benefits – life, LTD, critical illness, accident, etc. – that can save the day when catastrophe strikes. Brent Delveaux, benefits consultant for Vancouver-based TRG Group Benefits & Pensions Inc., agrees employees tend to be more interested in transactional benefits, or the day-to-day stuff, such as paramedical, vision, dental. But no matter how much money they make, people can usually afford physiotherapy or prescription glasses even without being fully covered under the plan, he says. “That’s not the case with some of the expensive drugs that are in the marketplace (for cancer, heart attack, stroke, etc.). All you need is one situation, and everyone in the company will understand how important that benefit was.” In light of that, Delveaux says advisors have a responsibility to ensure the employer understands how important the insurance-related benefits are. “If they are a small employer, they may not see claims very often. For that matter, they may never have a life, disability or CI claim. But we see the horror stories of people who don’t have proper insurance. We witness what a challenge it is to go on living their lives if they don’t have proper coverage. We make sure we share these stories (without naming names) with our clients.” Gary Kawaguchi, president of PRL Benefits Limited, also believes insurance-based benefits are much more critical than paramedical benefits. Employers, he says, need to think about catastrophic loss and provide catastrophic coverage (life, disability, CI, unlimited drugs, etc.) before anything else. Employers also need to determine, early on, their philosophy toward benefits. “Benefits are part of compensation. That means you have to anchor yourself relative to the industry you compete in, because you need to hire and retain employees in that field,” says Kawaguchi. “Once you’re well covered for catastrophic loss, you should try and provide ample choice and optimized flexibility for other benefits.”
By Warren Handsor 29 May, 2016
People seldom like to consider their own mortality and life insurance is rarely a topic of conversation. However, understanding the benefits of life insurance can help you plan for the future so life can go on with less to worry about.
By Warren Handsor 29 May, 2016
Buying a home can be the single biggest purchase an individual will ever make. According to statistics released by The Canadian Real Estate Association 481,113 homes were sold nationally. For most buyers, that purchase involves a substantial mortgage and years of debt. It is important for homeowners to know that there are options when it comes to protecting their home and their family's finances from the unexpected. Homeowners have the option of purchasing mortgage insurance from a lender when they get their mortgage or buying an individual term life insurance policy offered by an insurance company, which can be done at any time. Individual term life insurance and mortgage insurance have different features, and many homeowners can benefit from purchasing a term life insurance policy instead of mortgage insurance. Here are some of the primary advantages of term life insurance: No need to re-apply for coverage if you move or need to re-finance With mortgage insurance, if the homeowner switches banks, moves, or sells their home, they will have to re-qualify for mortgage insurance. This could be a challenge if there have been any health changes, and the cost of insurance usually increases the older you get. You choose your beneficiaries and they decide how the money is used With mortgage insurance, if the homeowner passes away, the lender will simply pay off the mortgage balance. In contrast, under an individual life insurance policy, the homeowner can choose one or multiple beneficiaries and the beneficiaries can use the insurance money to pay off some or all of the mortgage, or they may decide to pay other debts or living expenses. With term life insurance, your coverage amount does not decrease with your mortgage balance With mortgage insurance, the coverage amount declines as the mortgage declines but the premiums stay the same. This means the insured gets less and less value for the premiums they are paying. For example, if a $300,000 mortgage insurance policy starts at $50 a month, it may seem like a good deal. But if the mortgage is paid down to $150,000 and the premiums remain at $50 a month, the policy offers significantly less value. Buying mortgage insurance from the bank may be convenient, but it could cost more In general, the rates for mortgage insurance are often higher than those for term life insurance policies sold by insurance companies for the same coverage amount. For example, a equivalent 40 year old, healthy couple non-smoker purchasing $250,000 20-year term life insurance monthly premium $25@month during the intitial 20 year term versus the average of the monthly cost of mortgage insurance for a $250,000 mortgage from the Top Five Banks monthly premium $50@month* *Based on available rates for a healthy equivalent 40 year old non-smoker, purchasing a $250,000 purchasing a First to Die 20 year term Life May in 2016. Top five banks based on the average of the rates offered by Scotiabank, BMO, TD Bank, RBC, and CIBC for mortgage insurance for the same equivalency obtaining a $250,000 mortgage as determined by Empire Life in a survey conducted January 2015 insurance cost was 50% more than traditional 20 year Term.
More Posts
Share by: